header image
Inicio arrow Soluciones informáticas
Presentacion página de inicio PDF Imprimir E-Mail

Delrei13, es una empresa de consultoría, fundada en 2006 debido a  la unión de diversos profesionales del sector.

La empresa tiene sede en la Barcelona, y Lleida, con 4 verticales de negocios, en las cuales están incluídos productos regulares y proyectos especiales:

  • Consultoría Soluciones Internet, Software libre.
  • Consultoría
  • Entrenamiento y formación
  • Outsourcing Estratégico

 

Teleco ofrece servicios de consultoría en Inteligencia de Mercado, en las áreas de Celular, Banda Ancha, Telefonía fija y TV por Suscripción, y cubre, entre otros, los siguientes aspectos:

  • Ambiente Regulatorio
  • Recursos escasos (Frecuencias, Numeración, Posiciones Orbitales)
  • Proyecciones de Crecimiento
  • Competición
  • Indicadores
  • Desempeño Operacional
  • Desempeño Financiero
  • Canales de distribución

Teleco ofrece los siguientes productos:

  • Informes anuales de Celular y Telefonía Fija, Banda Ancha y TV por Suscripción en Brasil. (+ detalles - port.)
  • Informes customizados con un análisis de segmentos do mercado de las telecomunicaciones en Brasil y en América Latina.
  • Preparación de White Papers
  • Charlas y Workshops
  • Preparación de bases de información del sector

Entrenamiento

 

 

Teleco ofrece entrenamiento técnico y en Inteligencia de Mercado en Telecomunicaciones. Los cursos pueden ser presenciales o vía web (E-Learning). Teleco lo ofrece trimestralmente el:

  • Workshop trimestral Business Intelligence. (+ detalles)

Outsourcing Estratégico

 

Teleco provee outsourcing estratégico de servicios auditoría, gestión de redes de asistencia técnica, logística reversa, soporte técnico y entrenamiento. Estas actividades son ejecutadas con el soporte de sistema vía web desarrollado por Teleco y customizado para los procesos del cliente. Entre las áreas de actuación de Teleco, se destaca la prestación de estos servicios para redes de asistencia técnica de teléfonos celulares y logistica reversa de estos equipos.

 
Future Networks PDF Imprimir E-Mail
Future Networks
The next generation of networks will move beyond disconnected device-specific networks and systems and toward a distributed infrastructure, with intelligent functions residing across the entire network, from its edge to its core.


Sensors

#htmlarticlebody div { display:none; } #htmlarticlebody #page1 { display:block; } function showHTMLPager(){ if(document.getElementById("htmlarticlebody")){ pageNum = 1; pageCount = 1; while(document.getElementById("page" + (pageCount + 1))) pageCount++; pagerStr = getPager(pageCount,pageNum); pageHTML = document.getElementById("htmlarticlebody").innerHTML; document.getElementById("htmlarticlebody").innerHTML = "
" + pagerStr + "
" + pageHTML + "
" + pagerStr + "
" } } function getPager(pageCount,pageNum){ // imageDir = "/sensorswireless/sitewide/images"; articlePage = "/sensorswireless/article/articleDetail.jsp?id=498918"; pagerStr = ""; if(pageCount> 1){ if(pageNum> 1){ pagerStr += ""; } pagesCellWidth = (pageNum> 1 && pageNum " + x + ""; }else{ pagerStr += " " + x + ""; } } if(pageNum Next »
"; } } return pagerStr; } addLoadEvent(showHTMLPager);
As enterprises push their networks to integrate more and more processes and functions, such as advanced monitoring, automation, security, and asset tracking, they consistently encounter a common challenge—the integration of data and control functions from an increasing number of diverse sensors and devices. Although many enterprises have embraced the need to connect sensors and other edge assets to their IT networks, the means of doing so remains either too limited or too complex to effectively integrate, process, and correlate the data from, and communicate with, these devices.

The Challenge
The challenge lies in the device-centric (as opposed to network-centric) nature of both legacy and emerging edge-asset deployments. Sensors, actuators, wireless sensor networks, RFID systems, imagery devices, and other edge-of-network systems and devices are often vendor or protocol specific. Integration of data from these assets requires unique or specialized interfaces and applications, including middleware limited to certain devices, vendors, or protocols. An enterprise can successfully use Vendor A's sensors and middleware to integrate data into its network, but it then faces a tough task in trying to integrate and correlate sensor and other edge-asset data from other vendors' devices.

The burden of integrating edge-asset data rests on the enterprise. Under these constraints, enterprise engineers and developers can either accept the shortcomings of vendor-specific end-to-end systems, write customized code to develop interfaces and applications each time a sensor or other device is added to an existing network, or apply both. If the first option is chosen, the opportunity to advance dynamic applications relying on data from disparate devices may be lost. If enterprises pursue the second or third options, the result can be a significant waste of time and resources on the development, testing, and deployment of customized software code and middleware components.

The status quo also impacts the deployment of edge assets. With the often problematic integration of data or control functions, the idea of extending the network infrastructure and intelligent applications to the level of these devices has been, to date, judged impractical. Often, edge assets exist within device-specific systems, isolated from the enterprise IT infrastructure and outside of the IP network. Enterprises are left with devices that can be deployed in the field, but that are entirely removed from the enterprise network.

Even if edge assets can be integrated into the network, convergence without intelligence has its drawbacks. Attempts to integrate edge data without processing and correlation can overwhelm the bandwidth of networks, especially wireless networks. In addition, the volume of data received by the enterprise—without processing, notifications, and automated event-based actions—can overwhelm end users. These capacity shortcomings create bottlenecks, lead to inefficient networks, and tax enterprise personnel.

Overcoming the Challenge
Some enterprises are breaking free from these constraints and moving toward open, scalable intelligent networks. These infrastructures will help enterprises reap greater benefits from both their network and their edge assets.

This new type of network moves beyond disconnected device-specific networks and systems and toward a network of networks. The next-generation enterprise network will also be distributed and intelligent, with processing capabilities and intelligent functions residing not only on centralized network servers and office workstations but also spread across the entire network, from the edge of the network to its core.

In the new unified network, data from edge assets are integrated and correlated in the field and converged with the enterprise network to power dynamic enterprise systems and applications. The new paradigm delivers more efficient business operations, increased return on investment, and decreased total cost of ownership.

The next-generation network takes the burden of edge-asset integration, processing, correlation, and communication functions from the enterprise and places it on the middleware and other software applications deployed throughout the network on gateways, network appliances, servers, routers, and other hardware. By making the network application-aware, the enterprise embeds and distributes intelligence throughout the infrastructure. This means focusing more on the needs of the enterprise and the capacity of the network and less on the restrictions of vendor- or protocol-specific devices and the associated information silos (Figure 1).

Click for larger image Figure 1. A next-generation network, with applications that support an open infrastructure deployed on servers, workstations, and intelligent network appliances to power dynamic enterprise and desktop applications (Click image for larger version)

The Secret Is in the Interface
Device-, vendor-, and protocol-agnostic middleware and other software applications, embedded throughout the network and on network-connected devices, will power the next-generation network. With built-in support for rich integration methods, open-network technologies are not constrained by the usual cross-protocol communications problems. These technologies will be able to integrate data from a wide range of sources, including:

  • Existing databases and data files
  • TCP- or UDP-based devices
  • Serial port-based devices
  • Web services-based devices
  • Devices with features and functions accessible via managed or unmanaged calls

In addition to these integration methods, next-generation network software will also support the following capabilities:

  • Protocol/format encoding and decoding
  • Complex event processing
  • Low-level event processing for notifications and alerts
  • Data correlation and fusion
  • Event- and policy-based actions
  • Bidirectional communications for monitoring, control, and automation functions

Simply put, intelligent convergence applications—supported by a unified middleware platform or built with standardized components in an integrated development environment—can distribute data to, and exercise control over, multiple network devices and applications via standard communications protocols. This reduces, and in some cases eliminates, the need for separate middleware or the development of front-end and back-end code for edge-asset networks and control systems.

Allegheny Power's Intelligent Network
These technologies allow enterprises to streamline development, monitoring, management, and customization of extensible control systems and edge asset networks. Consider the case of Allegheny Power, a utility that delivers electric service to more than 1.5 million customers in Pennsylvania, West Virginia, Maryland, and Virginia.

Recently, the utility began a pilot project to upgrade its distribution system, which included the deployment of smart meters, devices that enable more accurate tracking of electricity usage. As the company planned the meter deployment, it tried to maximize its previous investments in sensors and other edge assets, which had existed outside of its IT network. The utility sought to integrate both new and legacy assets using a common communications backbone. To achieve these goals, the company decided to implement a communications infrastructure that supported circuit-level monitoring and response from a diverse network of sensors, actuators, devices, and smart meters. As envisioned, this network would:

  • Integrate data from smart meters, energy management systems, sensors, actuators, and other edge devices and systems
  • Support protocol conversion and data transformation (including convergence of data from ZigBee, 900 MHz, or stand-alone sensors or actuators into IP-based WiFi and WiMax networks)
  • Support distributed, edge-of-network processing capabilities, such as complex event processing, event filtering, event notification, and data correlation
  • Enable distribution of data from and control over edge devices
  • Provide an application server for future implementations of autonomous system algorithms

Allegheny Power believed the best way to cost-effectively achieve such an infrastructure would be to use intelligent networking technologies. From a network architecture perspective, the network entails two principal elements:

  • WiFi mesh access points or WiMax base stations, providing a self-healing wireless communications backbone with back-haul capability
  • Network appliances, equipped with vendor- and protocol-agnostic middleware and software applications, to serve as clients in both WiFi mesh and WiMax deployments and provide the connectivity for non-WiFi and non-WiMax devices to connect into the WiFi mesh or WiMax backbone

For this effort, Allegheny Power selected network appliances and the associated middleware from Augusta Systems (see sidebar "Next-Generation Network Building Blocks"). In the intelligent network, the Augusta Systems appliances act as supercharged gateways for collecting data from and effecting control over smart meters, sensors, and actuators throughout the distribution circuits and at substations. The appliances serve as client devices and enable non-WiFi and non-WiMax devices to connect to the network backbone.

With the combined power of a WiFi mesh or WiMax backbone and the intelligent appliances, the network provides a mechanism to route data and control instructions among assets. The architecture allows the utility to extend the enterprise IP network and IT infrastructure to reach the field-level distribution circuits (Figure 2). As a result, the infrastructure optimizes distribution assets and minimizes operations and maintenance expenses.

Click for larger image Figure 2. A next-generation network applied to an electricity distribution system, enabling intelligent automation and advanced monitoring applications (Click image for larger version)

Allegheny Power is using this new approach in intelligent automation and advanced monitoring. In intelligent automation, the network will support circuit-level monitoring and response, including self-healing features in the event of power outages. Once fully deployed, the network will feature an autonomous, self-healing system consisting of reclosers and switches, state-of-the-art sensors, and system automation software. The system, installed on two 12.5 kV electrical distribution feeders, will dynamically collect data from the feeders and, in case of a fault, will isolate the fault and restore some or all electrical service by tapping adjacent feeders in real-time without manual intervention from system operators.

The WiFi mesh infrastructure will enable point-to-multipoint communications through the deployment of WiFi mesh-enabled intelligent network appliances and WiFi mesh access points. The mesh networking will support continuous connections and reconfiguration around broken or blocked paths by hopping from node to node until the desired destination is reached. The self-healing nature of the wireless communications infrastructure means the network will continue to operate even with a node or connection breaks down. Allegheny Power will be able to automatically detect, analyze, respond to, and restore malfunctioning grid elements or network sections.

In another planned deployment, Allegheny Power will monitor remote segments of the distribution system, including substations, distribution lines, and smart meters. The monitoring system will consist of the network, current transducers, transformer health-monitoring sensors (including fluid level and temperature monitoring), and smart meters.

The edge assets deployed across the network enable synchronized monitoring of system health parameters. The devices can transmit data at scheduled intervals or upon a triggering event (e.g., no current on a line) to a centralized data-collection and data-processing point. Here the system can merge data from multiple units, analyze potentially harmful combinations of data, compress them, and transmit them back to the central power system monitoring location, which can instantaneous notify designated personnel of user-defined alarm conditions.

Looking Forward
An open infrastructure coupled with distributed intelligence provides the capacity for next-generation networks, which integrate data from the edge of the network to the core. By implementing these approaches and technologies, Allegheny Power and other enterprises have transcended traditional integration costs and network-capacity limitations.

Next-generation networks will feature vendor- and protocol-agnostic middleware and software applications, eliminating the limitations of stand-alone systems and laborious integration efforts. Intelligent networks represent the future of enterprise IT.

 
Types of networks PDF Imprimir E-Mail

There are about eight types of network which are used world wide these days, both in houses and commercially. These networks are used on the bases of their scale and scope, historical reasons, preferences for networking industries, and their design and implementation issues. LAN and WAN are mostly known and used widely. LAN, local area network was first invented for communication between two computers. LAN operates through cables and network cards. Later WLAN, Wireless local area network was formed through LAN concept, there are no wires involved in communication between computers, and Wireless LAN cards are required to connect to wireless network. LAN is the original network out of which other networks are formed according to requirements. They are as follow.

 

 

  • LAN - Local Area Network
  • WLAN - Wireless Local Area Network
  • WAN - Wide Area Network
  • MAN - Metropolitan Area Network
  • SAN - Storage Area Network, It can also refer with names like System Area Network, Server Area Network, or sometimes Small Area Network
  • CAN - Campus Area Network, Controller Area Network, and often Cluster Area Network
  • PAN - Personal Area Network
  • DAN - Desk Area Network

 

 

LAN - Local Area Network

 

LAN connects networking devices with in short spam of area, i.e. small offices, home, internet cafes etc. LAN uses TCP/IP network protocol for communication between computers. It is often but not always implemented as a single IP subnet. Since LAN is operated in short area so It can be control and administrate by single person or organization.

 

 

google_protectAndRun("ads_core.google_render_ad", google_handleError, google_render_ad);

 

WAN - Wide Area Network

 

As “word” Wide implies, WAN, wide area network cover large distance for communication between computers. The Internet it self is the biggest example of Wide area network, WAN, which is covering the entire earth. WAN is distributed collection of geographically LANs. A network connecting device router connects LANs to WANs. WAN used network protocols like ATM, X.25, and Frame Relay for long distance connectivity.

 

Wireless - Local Area Network  


A LAN, local area network based on wireless network technology mostly referred as Wi-Fi. Unlike LAN, in   WLAN no wires are used, but radio signals are the medium for communication. Wireless network cards are required to be installed in the systems for accessing any wireless network around. Mostly wireless cards connect to wireless routers for communication among computers or accessing WAN, internet.


MAN - Metropolitan Area Network


This kind of network is not mostly used but it has its own importance for some government bodies and organizations on larger scale. MAN, metropolitan area network falls in middle of LAN and WAN, It covers large span of physical area than LAN but smaller than WAN, such as a city.

 

 CAN - Campus Area Network


Networking spanning with multiple LANs but smaller than a Metropolitan area network, MAN. This kind of network mostly used in relatively large universities or local business offices and buildings.


  SAN - Storage Area Network


SAM technology is used for data storage and it has no use for most of the organization but data oriented organizations. Storage area network connects servers to data storage devices by using Fiber channel technology.     

 


SAN - System Area Network

 

SAN, system area networks are also known as cluster area network and it connects high performance computers with high speed connections in cluster configuration.

 

 
iee 802.11 PDF Imprimir E-Mail

IEEE 802.11 is standard use world widely for Wireless Local Area network, WLAN, it stands for Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers. In simple words it is standard of communication between computers and wireless devices. The standards were set by IEEE LAN/MAN Standard committee in 5GHZ and 2.4 GHz public spectrum bands.

 

The IEEE 802.11 is consisting of of numerous mechanism and services that interrelate to present station mobility translucent to the higher layers of the network mass. IEEE 802.11 is a combination of wireless LAN. We can use IEEE 802.11 and WiFi often as interchangeably depends on market demand. It is a basic protocol of any high speed wireless network from 1997 to 2008. There are lots of change occurred in it but the basics “high performance" never change. The frequency of it is from 2.4 GHz to 5 GHz and range is from 100 meter to 5000 meter. It specifies a single medium access control as MAC and three physical layers and offering different service such as Authentication of system, Deauthentication of system, data privacy, MSDU delivery, Association with files and system, Disassociation, Distribution of data, Integration of information, and Reassociation. You can configure a station with IEEE 802.11 in different ways as independent configuration, and infra-structure configuration. The IEEE 802.11 starts from the need to connect more than one computer with each other wirelessly especially where the wire cannot go.

 

google_protectAndRun("ads_core.google_render_ad", google_handleError, google_render_ad);

 

IEEE 802.11 required accepting device to activate in a peer-to-peer fashion within the possibly of overlie same as access control level and data transformation services to allow top layers .There are several physical layer represent signaling methods and interfaces. Solitude and safety of user data is being moved over the wireless media via IEEE 802.11.According to OSI model an IEEE 802.11 protocol having direct frequency, hopping sequence, spread spectrum PHY and infrared PHY. IEEE 802.11 specifies a single medium access sub layers called MAC and physical layers with different specifications. The first is physical layers having two radio and infrared. The physical layer contain Frequency Hopping Spread Spectrum Radio PHY offering 1 Mbit/s with two level and 2 Mbit/s with 4 level,  As it is Direct Sequence Spread Spectrum Radio PHY provides DBPSK and DQPSK with 1 and 2 Mbit/s operation, Infrared PHY offer 1 Mbit/s with16-PPM and 2 Mbit/s with –PPM.

 

These days 802.11a, 802.11b, and 802.11g are mostly in use to create a network home, offices and commercial locations. The architecture of IEEE 802.11 consists of 802.1X for verification, RSN for maintenance track of links, and AES-based CCMP to provide privacy, veracity and basis. IEEE 802.11with the propagation of modems and DSL services makes it reliable. People always desire to set up small networks in their homes to distribute their elevated rate Internet connection. There are many free networks commonly permit anyone within specific range, counting passersby outer, to connect to the Internet. There is also hard work by unpaid helper groups to launch wireless community networks to provide free wireless connectivity to the public. Networking without wire has a talented prospect with 802.11.The dynamic nature of IEEE 802.11 increasing radically in the near future.

 
PAN PDF Imprimir E-Mail

Personal area network (PAN) is a computer network designed for communication between computer devices (including telephones and personal digital assistants close to one person). The devices may or may not belong to the person in question. The reach of a PAN is typically a few meters. PANs can be used for communication among the personal devices themselves or for connecting to a higher level network and the Internet.Personal area networks may be wired with computer buses such as USB and FireWire. A wireless personal area network (WPAN) can also be made possible with network technologies such as IrDA and Bluetooth.

 

 

A Bluetooth PAN is also called a piconet, and is composed of up to 8 active devices in a master-slave relationship. The first Bluetooth device in the piconet is the master, and all other devices are slaves that communicate with the master. A piconet typically has a range of 10 meters, although ranges of up to 100 meters can be reached under ideal circumstances.

 

 

google_protectAndRun("ads_core.google_render_ad", google_handleError, google_render_ad);

 

SECURITY THREAT AND REQUIREMENTS OF WIRELESS PAN

Bluetooth offers several benefits and advantages. However, organizations must not only address the security threats associated with Bluetooth before they implement the technologies; they must also measure the vulnerabilities of the devices they allow to participate in the Bluetooth networks. Specifically, agencies need to address security concerns for confidentiality, data integrity, and network availability. Moreover, since Bluetooth devices are more likely to be managed by users that are less security conscious than administrators, they are more likely to contribute to uncontrolled security drifts. This subsection will briefly cover some of the risks to security, i.e., attacks on confidentiality, integrity, and network availability.

 

Loss Of Confidentiality

Threats to confidentiality involve, first of all, compromised Bluetooth devices. When a Bluetooth device that is part of a piconet becomes compromised (e.g., is in the possession of an unauthorized user), it may still receive information that the malicious user should not access. Moreover, the compromised device may still have network or information privileges, resulting in a compromise of the wider network as well. In the latter case, the compromised device may not only receive normal proprietary traffic but may also request that information as part of a targeted network attack. A trait of Bluetooth that makes this compromise unique is that the Bluetooth network requires device and not the user authentication to access resources. Once the device is authenticated, it is automatically connected to resources without the need for subsequent authentication. (Geoff Huston, the wireless internet)

 

Loss Of Integrity

Iinfringements of integrity result from the corruption of an organization’s or user’s data. The direct effect is similar to that of a confidentiality, or disclosure, threat: a compromised network. However, integrity threats extend beyond this, involving the alteration, addition, or deletion of information, which is then passed through the network without the user’s or network administrator’s knowledge. Information that is subject to corruption includes files on the network and data on user devices. For example, a malicious user might use an untrusted device, such as a PDA, to access the address book of another PDA or laptop. However, instead of just monitoring the information, as would be the case with a disclosure threat, the malicious user alters the contact information without the owner’s knowledge or may even delete the information completely. If undetected, such attacks could result in the agency or user losing confidence in its data and system. Users should verify that their Bluetooth product does not allow automatic data synchronization to prevent the alteration of any information without the acknowledgement user of that device.

 

Loss Of Avaiability

Denial of service attacks cause in the loss of network availability for authorized users and devices. Denial of service attacks block authorized user access to system resources and network applications. Besides the typical DoS attacks directed against LANs and Internet services, Bluetooth devices are also susceptible to signal jamming. Bluetooth devices share bandwidth with microwave ovens, cordless phones, and other wireless networks and thus are exposed to interference. Malicious users can interfere with the flow of information by using devices that transmit in the 2.4 GHz ISM band. Disrupting the routing protocol prevents ad hoc network devices from negotiating the network’s dynamic topologies. Remote users may encounter jamming more frequently than on-site users. Remote users must contend with the same interference that users experience in the office. Further, since the remote environment is uncontrolled, remote devices are more likely to be in close immediacy to devices that are intentionally or unintentionally jamming their signals.       Another threat associated with ad hoc devices is a battery exhaustion attack. This attack attempts to disable a device by draining its battery. A malicious user continually sends requests to the device asking for data transfers (assuming the user is part of the network topology) or asking the device to create a network. Although this type of attack does not compromise network security, it ultimately prevents the user from gaining access to the network, because the device cannot function. (Juha T. Vainio, May 25, 2000)

 

SOLUTIONS & SECURITY MEASURES FOR WPAN

Wireless Personal Area Network and other Bluetooth technologies are relatively new standard and have yet to become common in the marketplace. However, solutions and improvements are available to help secure WPAN networks. These measures include management solutions, operational solutions, and technical solutions

 

Management Solutions.

The first line of protection is to provide a sufficient level of knowledge and understanding for those who will deal with WPAN & Bluetooth enabled devices & networks. Organizations using wireless personal area network technology need to establish and document security policies that address the use of Bluetooth enabled devices and the user’s responsibilities. The policy document should include a list of approved uses for WPAN’s, the type of information that may be transferred in the network, and any disciplinary actions that may result from misuse. The security policy should also specify a proper password usage scheme.

 

Operational Solutions

Since Bluetooth devices do not register when they join a network, they are invisible to network administrators. Consequently, it is difficult for administrators to apply traditional physical security measures. However, there are some security approaches that can be applied, including establishing spatial distance and securing the gateway Bluetooth devices that connect remote Bluetooth networks or devices. Establishing spatial distance requires setting the power requirements low enough to prevent a device operating on the organizations premises from having sufficient power to be detected outside physical boundaries. This spatial distance in effect creates a more secure boundary. Currently, Bluetooth devices have a useful range of approximately 30 feet. Organizations that require both high levels of security and low levels of security should maintain a secure perimeter so that on site network users can maintain secure connections in their office premises. Agencies with requirements for high levels of security should also restrict unauthorized personnel from using PDAs, laptops, and other electronic devices within the secure perimeter. (Tom karygiannis, Les Owens, Nov 2002)

 

Technical Solutions

As with WLANs and Bluetooth technical solutions & improvements fall into one of two categories: software security solutions and hardware security solutions. Bluetooth software solutions focus on Personal Identification Number (PIN) and private authentications, while hardware solutions involve the use of the Bluetooth device address and link keys that reside at the link level. Again, it should be noted that hardware solutions, which generally have software components, are into simply as hardware solutions.

 
<< Inicio < Anterior 1 2 Siguiente > Final >>

Resultados 1 - 9 de 16





¿Recuperar clave?
¿Quiere registrarse? Regístrese aquí